Archive for January, 2016

kingdom of man (Responsibility – Extended)

Monday, January 25th, 2016

Here, I am reminded of this passage of Scripture.

Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man’s device. And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead.

(Acts 17:29-31)

I want you to consider that Scripture, as being of broader application than, just for the time that is the revelation of Jesus Christ. I want you to think of that Scripture as being applicable to any time of transition that moves us from infant-like understanding, to the position of bearing responsibility for adherence to a known fact. Here, we are thinking about the transition that is described below.

. . .

– Explore kingdom of man: Part Sixteen –

Posted in kingdom of man | No Comments »

Election to Serve – Delicately (Newness, Life Spawning)

Thursday, January 14th, 2016

There is no need for any woman of God to ignore the majesty of her position in the LORD. The woman is the portal through which the LORD delivers new things; chief among which are, those ones that are in the category of, life spawning. For instance, this is one of the particularly significant appearances of such products.

Then came the daughters of Zelophehad, the son of Hepher, the son of Gilead, the son of Machir, the son of Manasseh, of the families of Manasseh the son of Joseph: and these are the names of his daughters; Mahlah, Noah, and Hoglah, and Milcah, and Tirzah. And they stood before Moses, and before Eleazar the priest, and before the princes and all the congregation, by the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, saying, Our father died in the wilderness, and he was not in the company of them that gathered themselves together against the LORD in the company of Korah; but died in his own sin, and had no sons. Why should the name of our father be done away from among his family, because he hath no son? Give unto us therefore a possession among the brethren of our father.

(Numbers 27:1-4)

This action of those daughters brought about the first change in succession planning, as it was practiced among the Israelite line of the children of Abraham.

. . .

– Explore Election to Serve – Delicately: Part Twelve –

Posted in Election to Serve | No Comments »